 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
HP wants to eliminate the use of PVC and BFR by 2011 (see 'Substances of Concern). |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? |
 |
HP still has PVC and BFRs in different applications. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
All three groups of chemicals are on the list of 'possible future restrictions', thus it is not yet concrete and certain. |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? |
 |
HP still uses these groups of chemicals. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? |
 |
HP has signed the Individual producer responsibility (IPR) statement and supports IPR explicitly. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? |
 |
The recycling services for the hardware products and cartridges seem to be easily accessible for a large part of the countries where the products are sold. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? |
 |
Some numbers are given, but they do not cover all products and no percentage is presented. |
SOURCE
|