 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
PVC is already banned, all BFRs will be banned from 2010. |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? |
 |
PVCs are banned, but all BFRs will only be banned from 2010. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
 |
All 3 groups of chemicals are on the list of chemicals to be banned. |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? |
 |
Phtalates is banned already, beryllium is still used (but will be banned from all products from 2010). Antimony and its compounds are not set to be banned. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? |
 |
Nokia supports the IPR-statement. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? |
 |
Yes. There are a lot of 'Nokia-points' where recycling takes place. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? |
 |
Nokia states that it is actively researching the use of recycled materials, but no numbers/percentages/outcomes are provided. |
SOURCE
|