Sony Info

Rank a Brand score:
7 out of 18

Sony Logo

Sony
Last Updated: 18 August 2010
Last Verified: 18 August 2010

Sony Score Report

Questions about Carbon Emissions
3 out of 5
Left_corn     Right_corn
1. Does the brand (company) clearly support global mandatory cuts of carbon emissions of at least 50% by 2050 or 30% by industrialized countries by 2020? Sony supports global mandatory cuts of 50% by 2050. SOURCE
2. Does the brand (company) disclose its carbon footprint produced by its own operations and in the supply / production chain? Sony produced approximately 26 million tonnes of CO2 in FY2008. This includes at least some emissions from the production chain (see section 'Environmental Indicators and Eco-Efficiency'). SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its ‘own operations’ carbon footprint by at least 20% by the year 2012? Sony presents a goal of reducing emissions with 7% by 2010 compared to 2000, but recently stated it also wants to reduce its emissions with 30 % by 2016 (compared to FY2000). Not clear what it will be in 2012. SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already reduced its 'own operations' carbon footprint by at least 10% in the last 5 years? See section "Green Management 2010: Progress Report" where it is stated that Sony achieved a decrease of 17% of GhG emissions from business sites based on the fiscal year 2000 level by 2008. SOURCE
5. Do all new products of the brand meet the latest Energy Star requirements (where applicable)? Not all new Sony products meet the latest Energy star requirements SOURCE
Questions about Environmental Policy
2 out of 7
Left_corn     Right_corn
1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? Sony wants to eliminate PVC and BFRs in new products by the end of fiscal year 2010. SOURCE
2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? Not likely, since Sony wants to eliminate PVC and BFRs in new products by the end of fiscal year 2010. SOURCE
3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? Phthalates banned in some products, not all. Beryllium oxide has been banned in some products. Antimony not mentioned. SOURCE
4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? Not likely. Phthalates banned in some products, not all. Beryllium oxide has been banned in some products. Antimony not mentioned. SOURCE
5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? Sony supports Individual Product Responsibility (IPR). SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? Sony offers this service for some products in some countries, but not in a large part of the countries where the products are sold. SOURCE
7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? Sony uses recycled plastic from discarded CDs. However, no numers or percentages are mentioned. SOURCE
Questions about Labour Conditions/Human Rights
2 out of 6
Left_corn     Right_corn
1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labour, no child labour, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? All standards mentioned in Sony Supplier Code of Conduct (see page 2). SOURCE
2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? 1. Not mentioned; 2. No, working hours have to No, supplier must comply with applicable laws and regulations regarding work hours, but maximum workweek and hours of overtime is not specified; 3. No, mentioning of minimum wage, not living wage (see page 2). SOURCE
3. Does this CoC include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? This right is mentioned, with reference to parallel means for the situation of law restrictions (see page 2). SOURCE
4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? Not found on Sony website. SOURCE
5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labour conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labour conditions? Sony is a member of EICC. SOURCE
6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labour conditions policy? Although Sony publishes a report anually, no factory audits or corrective action plans and re-audits could be found. SOURCE