 |
|
|
 |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labour, no child labour, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
 |
No CoC found on the website, although Spunky claims it has high standards on this issue. |
SOURCE
|
| 2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? |
 |
See remark question 1. |
SOURCE
|
| 3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? |
 |
See remark question 1. |
SOURCE
|
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
 |
No list of factories found on the website, although an unannounced factory check in january 2009 is mentioned. |
SOURCE
|
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labour conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labour conditions? |
 |
Not found on the website. |
SOURCE
|
| 6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labour unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? |
 |
Not found on the website. |
SOURCE
|
| 7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labour conditions policy? |
 |
Not found on the website. |
SOURCE
|
| 8. Has the brand's labour conditions policy resulted in a 'compliance level' of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a 'monitored level' of at least 80%? |
 |
Spunky wants to buy from Fairtrade registered factories, but says to be unable to do this, because they are 'unable to reach the minimum quantities required to manufacture our products with them'. |
SOURCE
|